So please, take some time to read The Center's assessment, composed and researched by our director of Bioethics and Public Policy, Dr. Marie Hilliard, HERE. Then ACT and write to our government. Lend your strength to the voices of Faith, Justice, and the Good.
And most of all, pray for the outcome of these proceedings. May God's will be done.
Here is an excerpt from Marie's writing:
The NPRM [Notice of Proposed Rule Making] seeks public comment on
the Proposed Rule, the “Summary” of which states:
The proposed rules would amend
the authorization to exempt group health plans established or maintained by
certain religious employers (and group health insurance coverage provided in
connection with such plans) with respect to the requirement to cover
contraceptive services. The proposed rules would also
establish accommodations for
group health plans established or maintained by eligible organizations (and group
health insurance coverage offered in connection with such plans),
including student health insurance coverage arranged by eligible
organizations that are religious institutions of higher
education.6
In fact, the Proposed Rule itself
asserts that “The Departments believe that this Proposed Rule would not expand
the universe of employer plans that would qualify for the exemption beyond that which was
intended in the 2012 final rules.”7 Thus, pursuant to this Proposed Rule, most, if not all,
of our membership will not be exempt and will be subject to the violations of their religious
freedom and their conscientious objections to these methods by the mandates contained in the
Proposed Rule.
6 78 Fed. Reg. 8456-8476
(February 6, 2013), at 8456-8457.
7 Ibid, 8461.
The Center wishes to comment on
the following concerns pertaining to the Proposed
Rule in the NPRM:
1. The Proposed Rule continues to
create new law by narrowly defining which organizations the federal
government arbitrarily will recognize as exempt: “Religious employers,” which basically
include only “churches, their integrated auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of churches,”
or “the exclusively religious activities of any religious order.”8
The Proposed Rule violates the Establishment
Clause of the First Amendment9 of the U.S. Constitution in that de
facto the Proposed Rule is establishing what the administration considers to be a religious
organization. It is creating an arbitrary definition and legal recognition of some religious
organizations, inconsistent with federal law, deeming some, but not others, to have an equal
protection under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the Religious Freedom Restoration
Act.10 Specifically, despite the fact that thousands of other religious organizations are
recognized under a federal Group Ruling11 as being organized and operating as non-profit religious
organizations, they are being deemed, under this legally
inaccurate and arbitrary
delineation, as not religious enough to be exempt from the mandated
coverage.
8 Internal Revenue Code section
6033(a)(3)(A)(i) and (iii), as cited in 78 Fed. Reg. 8458.
9 U.S. Constitution: First
Amendment.
10 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb through 42
U.S.C. § 2000bb-4.
11 In 1946 the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) issued to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and
its predecessor organization, a group
tax exemption ruling to Catholic organizations listed in The Official Catholic Directory (OCD). This is updated
annually. The Group Ruling establishes (1) that organizations included in the OCD are exempt from federal
income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code and from federal unemployment tax; and (2) that
contributions to such organizations are deductible for federal income, gift,
and estate tax purposes. See: http://www.usccb.org/about/general-counsel/upload/group-ruling-memo.pdf.
Reminding everyone that understands serious danger of HHS Mandate to get there April 8th Deadline comment in TONIGHT by Midnight:)
ReplyDeleteVery good point Colleen. Thank you for your comment! It is important not to lose a major detail in our attempt to impart the very real sense of urgency we feel about this issue. To all reading, listen to the NCBC and Colleen and get your comment in tonight by midnight!
ReplyDeletehttp://nchla.org/actiondisplay.asp?ID=292
I have been following this debate for a long time, and have tried to apply Catholic moral standards to my small business practices. The HHS Mandate has placed many small business owners like myself in a horrible position. I am now planning to terminate my business's group policy.
ReplyDeleteMy question for the NCBC is, can faithful Catholics purchase private insurance if we know we are not going to be using immoral services? There has been no guidance on this. Are we to put our families at substantial financial risk (possible financial ruin)?
Thanks for your Center and the help you give our bishops and country.
Thank you for your comment, Rich! We are so glad to see that you take the moral implications of these mandates so seriously. These are exactly the types of concerns we love to help with! In these cases, where so many of these policies are still unclear or are in a state of flux, it is often a more effective approach to address each person's (or business's) concerns individually and specifically.
ReplyDeleteIf it's not too much trouble, please re-post your question via our online consults page: http://ncbcenter.org/page.aspx?pid=1174
This way we can have your e-mail and ensure you get a quick response! Plus, it's free for individuals!
Thank you so much for your time and for your desire to uphold Catholic Moral Teaching. We hope any and all who read this blog will continue to seek our help in the future. Don't hesitate to ask; the NCBC is here for you!